(Excerpted from chapter 9)
Bop Contrasted with Swing
Bop differed from swing in a number of performance aspects:
- Preferred instrumentation for bop was the small combo instead of big band.
- Less emphasis was placed on arrangements in bop.
- Average tempo was faster in bop.
- Clarinet was rare in bop.
- Display of instrumental virtuosity was a higher priority for bop players.
- Rhythm guitar was rare.
Bop differed from swing in a number of stylistic respects:
1. | Bop improvisation was more complex because it contained | |
a) more themes per solo, | ||
b) less similarity among themes, | ||
c) more excursions outside the tune’s original key, and | ||
d) a greater scope of rhythmic development. | ||
2. | Melodies were more complex in bop. | |
3. | Harmonies were more complex in bop. | |
4. | Bop tunes and chord progressions projected a more unresolved quality. | |
5. | Accompaniment rhythms were more varied in bop. | |
6. | Comping was more prevalent than stride style and simple, on-the-beat chording. | |
7. | Drummers played their timekeeping rhythms primarily on suspended cymbal, rather than snare drum, high-hat, or bass drum. | |
8. | Surprise was more highly valued in bop. | |
9. | Bop was a more agitated style than swing was. |
This is only an excerpt of the extensive coverage of bebop.